No one owns publishing rights to the Bible. However, some publishers own the right to publish a specific translation of the Bible. For example, the Lockman Foundation owns the right to publish the New American Standard Bible.
Who gets royalties from the Bible?
Whenever a modern translation is released the person who wrote the translation or the company that commissioned it would earn the royalties, older translations whose translators have been dead for more than 70 years are in the public domain.
Is the Bible considered public domain?
The World English Bible is one of the few public domain, twenty-first century English translations of the entire Bible, and it is freely distributed to the public using electronic formats.
|World English Bible|
|Derived from||American Standard Version 1901|
Who makes money from selling the Bible?
The Bible is public domain and, unless someone is pushing some fancy pants copyright translation or something, anybody can print and publish a copy of the Bible. Anyone can also, therefore, sell Bibles. The money thus earned goes to whoever printed, distributed and sold the specific copies in question.
Is the Bible copyright protected?
The Bible itself is not copyrighted. A particular translation of the Bible from its original languages into another language can be. This is to protect the livelihoods of the translators. It is similar to how a play based on a book has a separate copyright from the book.
Who has the rights to the King James Bible?
The crown has a perpetual copyright on the King James Bible, through “letters patent” originally issued to stop unofficial editions and then to protect the country from ranters, shakers, Quakers, nonconformity and popery.
Do I need permission to quote the Bible?
The Bible you typically do not need permission to quote. … If you quote from the King James Version (KJV), you’re unlikely to encounter any problems, as the translation was completed in 1611. It is also the most well know version of the Bible in English.
Which Bible versions are not copyrighted?
According to wikipedia : “The World English Bible (also known as the WEB) is a free updated revision of the American Standard Version (1901). It is one of the few public domain, present-day English translations of the entire Bible, and it is freely distributed to the public using electronic formats.”
Is the Bible trademarked?
The Bible itself is not Copyrighted, but many translations are, such as the Phillips, NIV, Moffatt, NKJV, RSV, NRSV, Amplified, and NASB. Wiki HQ has advised that according to US law, a work is automatically in the Public Domain if it is pre-1923.
Who Wrote the Bible?
According to both Jewish and Christian Dogma, the books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy (the first five books of the Bible and the entirety of the Torah) were all written by Moses in about 1,300 B.C. There are a few issues with this, however, such as the lack of evidence that Moses ever existed …
Can I sell Bibles?
Approach people at your church, or other churches. You could also set up a storefront to sell Bibles or sell them online, depending on how far you want to take your business. Display knowledge of your product. You can’t effectively sell Bibles if you don’t know the differences between the various versions.
Who makes Bibles?
They are a part of HarperCollins Christian Publishing, Inc. and has multiple imprints including Zondervan Academic, Zonderkidz, Blink, and Editorial Vida. Zondervan is the commercial rights holder for the New International Version (NIV) Bible in North America.
Is it legal to read the Bible on YouTube?
There is no law that prohibits the study of any book, on YouTube nor anywhere else, and the text of the bible is neither copyright nor trademarked. Even if it were, copyright laws are civil, not criminal, and there are thus no prison sentences for copyright violations.
Can God be copyrighted?
The Supreme Court has ruled that names of gods or holy books cannot be trademarked to sell goods and services. … The answer to the question as to whether any person can claim the name of a holy or religious book as a trademark for goods or services marketed by him is clearly ‘no’,” said the bench.